
Interactive
course
A guided digital experience that connects teaching, media and opportunities to practice.
Open opioid course ↗
Ashley Miller, PMHNP-BCClinical learning & LMS design
Built for real people.
I'm a psychiatric nurse practitioner and learning designer. I turn complex behavioral health topics into education people can understand and use, then build the learning systems around it.
The goal isn't to get through the content.
It's to know what to do with it.
Not three unrelated products. A connected learning experience for independent use, reflection and facilitated practice.

A guided digital experience that connects teaching, media and opportunities to practice.
Open opioid course ↗Personal triggers, response planning and usable prompts, with room to write rather than just read.
View 4-page excerpt ↗The same workbook sections translated into a session flow, prompts and facilitation boundaries.
View 2-page excerpt ↗Original Opioids & Your Brain workbook and guide excerpts. The film stills are from the related MOUD & Harm Reduction lesson. The course opens separately in Articulate.
Move beyond terminology into noticing a trigger, choosing a response and planning a next step.
Use an adult voice and private reflection without demanding personal disclosure.
Make the connection between the learner's page and the group's activity explicit.
Illustrated learning, visual cues and reflective prompts. The teaching has a clinical foundation; the experience doesn't have to read like a clinical manual.
These are selected original program pages, not newly invented sample content. Excerpts demonstrate instructional design and are not standalone treatment guidance.

A reentry plan can become a stack of information. This work makes room for what the transition feels like, then gives the learner a practical way to organize goals, routines and the next steps.
The illustrated workbook and interactive course use the same central topic. The selected pages show how visual structure and journaling turn a broad intention into a more usable plan.
Content architecture, delivery choices, access, learning paths and the information staff need to support the learner.
I think about the person using the material and the team responsible for delivering it.
My work extends into LMS planning and configuration: how content is organized, how learners reach it, how staff assign it, and how completion and updates are handled. Each delivery route has different requirements.
Define the scope, learner and content boundaries.
Organize the topic into a coherent learning sequence.
Adapt pages, media and checks to the platform.
Support the platform's approved access route.
Use completion data and feedback to guide updates.
Edovo courses were built in its native learning environment. That is a different authoring and delivery route from importing a SCORM package.
Keep approved sources and learning assets aligned.
Define launch, resume and completion requirements.
Plan enrollment and partner-approved sign-on.
Connect assignments, resources and certificates.
Separate learner progress from content maintenance.
Moodle/Open LMS and SCORM planning are part of the delivery toolkit. Sign-on, permissions, reporting and post-release access depend on the agreed implementation and testing.
Keep teaching consistent with the digital pathway.
Make each section clear enough to use on its own.
Provide useful prompts and room for reflection.
Map the same pages to group goals and prompts.
Listen to staff and learners, then refine the materials.
Print is a deliberate learning route, not a fallback document dump. Matching facilitator resources make the same content usable in guided groups or independent practice.
Conceptual delivery models for this portfolio. Not a production infrastructure diagram, security certification or claim that every integration is live. Private architecture, credentials and learner records are not included.
The materials are built for people to choose, engage with and return to. The reported Edovo sample offers one concrete view of completion across a defined set of titles.
I keep this separate from clinical outcomes, unique learner counts and claims about what caused the result. A useful metric should be easy to inspect, not just impressive at a glance.
364 completions out of 449 course starts
Calculation: 364 ÷ 449 × 100 = 81.07%, rounded to 81%. The widely distributed free Sleep course is excluded from this sample.
This is a course-level completion ratio, not 449 unique people, not the completion rate of the opioid course alone, and not a measure of clinical improvement. It does not establish causation or a controlled comparison.
Source: the Edovo snapshot and calculation supplied by Ashley for this portfolio. The underlying export and reporting date range were not supplied with this build.
Reported sample, not a live dashboard. The figure is not presented as the overall rate for the entire Mind Rehab catalog.
Start with the clinical meaning, learner context and safety boundaries. Make the language clearer without quietly changing the message.
Use reflection, scenarios and checks to support a decision or action. Avoid adding clicks simply to make a lesson look interactive.
Connect digital teaching, video, participant practice and group guidance so each format reinforces the same learning purpose.
Separate source fidelity, clinical review, media, accessibility and destination-LMS testing. A polished screen is not the only quality check.

Founder & Lead Clinical Instructional Designer
Mind Rehab
I want the learning to feel like someone understands the person on the other side of the screen.
My correctional psychiatric practice gives me a close view of the distance between knowing a clinical concept and being able to use it in a difficult moment.
I bring that perspective to learning design: thoughtful content, adult language, useful practice and the delivery structure that makes it available.